European Commission urges PSC leniency on EU Ship Recycling Regulation enforcement and IHM- Inventory of Hazardous Materials

November 21, 2020
leading-lights
Ship recycling

Guidelines have been issued by the European Commission to EU port State authorities to consider the challenges due toCovid-19 restrictions that led to significant difficulties in surveying ships for preparation of  certified IHMs  by the ship owners which might lead to their inability to meet the implementation date of 31 December 2020 for the carriage of a certified Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM) onboard ships as required by European Union Ship Recycling Regulation (EU SRR).

EC has issued Guidelines on the enforcement of obligations under the EU Ship Recycling Regulation relating to the Inventory of Hazardous Materials of vessels operating in European waters (2020/C 349/01).

Through these guidelines, EC  urges  port State control authorities to recognize the challenges faced by the shipping industry.  Two different scenarios  are envisaged in which compliance with the EU SRR may not be achieved.

Scenarios due to Covid-19.
In connection with the enforcement of the Ship Recycling Regulation, two specific Covid-19 related scenarios are likely to be confronted EU port States authorities that may require a more harmonized approach during inspections in accordance with the  general guiding principles issued.  This harmonized approach  is suggested to be temporarily applied  for a limited period of six months until 30 June 2021,  after the entry into application of the IHM-related obligations for existing EU-flagged vessels and non-EU flagged vessels calling at EU ports.

Scenario 1:Vessels without a valid IHM and/or accompanying certificate.
A vessel might  arrive at an EU port after 31 December 2020 without carrying on board a valid IHM and/or accompanying certificate (Inventory Certificate or Ready for Recycling certificate for EU-flagged vessel or Statement of Compliance for non-EU flagged vessel). The ship Owner/Master might claim that this non-compliance is due to the Covid-19 situation.

Suggested action as per EC Guidelines 2020/C 349/01
QUOTE
In all such cases where the failure to carry a valid IHM and/or the necessary certificate is involved, there is a burden of proof on the owner/master, who needs to provide evidence that all possible measures were taken to undertake the work and get the certification required. Such evidence of compliance efforts may include e.g. a service contract for sampling or a survey. It may also include a justification why it was not possible to obtain a semi-completed IHM and associated certificate as referred to in Section 2, including evidence of impossibility to comply with other elements of the certification than the on-board inspection. It is then for the inspector to decide whether this is acceptable on a case- by-case basis depending on the specific circumstances of the vessel in question and using his professional judgement. 

 If the inspector decides to accept the evidence provided by the owner/master, then for the Inventory Certificate or Statement of Compliance the inspector should specify that the documents should be completed and approved within 4 months after the inspection. In addition, a warning should be given to the vessel and the inspection result and warning should be registered in the ship recycling module of THETIS – EU. If these plans have to be amended further after the inspection, due to continuing travel or access restrictions, then the owner/master needs to provide sufficient written evidence from the IHM inspectors that it has not been feasible to meet the initial plans. Again, it is then for the inspector undertaking the next inspection to decide whether this evidence is acceptable on a case-by-case basis depending on the specific circumstances of the vessel in question and using his professional judgement. For the Ready for Recycling Certificate, if the inspector accepts the evidence after evaluation on a case-by-case basis, the owner/master of the vessel should be warned that they are required to obtain the Ready for Recycling Certificate before entering the ship recycling facility. As the Ready for Recycling Certificate is only valid for 3 months, it should be completed and approved at the earliest possible opportunity prior to the vessel undertaking its last voyage. The inspection result and warning should be registered in the ship recycling module of THETIS – EU.

UNQUOTE.

Scenario 2:  Vessels with a semi-completed IHM with an associated approved Inventory Certificate or Ready for Recycling Certificate (for EU-flagged ships) or the Statement of Compliance (for non-EU Flagged ships), that does not contain on-board (either targeted or random) sampling:
Because of the restrictions on inspecting a vessel during the Covid-19 pandemic, on-board surveys that should have been undertaken to support the IHM could not be done and in this case, a vessel might call at an EU port or anchorage after 31 December 2020 with an IHM and associated certificate on-board, but the IHM was prepared remotely without any on-board sampling.

Suggested action as per EC Guidelines 2020/C 349/01
QUOTE.
Vessels with a semi-completed IHM with an associated approved Inventory Certificate or Ready for Recycling Certificate (for EU flagged ships) or the Statement of Compliance (for non-EU Flagged ships), that does not contain on-board (either targeted or random) sampling

In this case the vessel may call at an EU port or anchorage after 31 December 2020 with an IHM and associated certificate on-board, but the IHM was prepared remotely without any on-board sampling. This situation may arise as the on-board surveys that should have been undertaken to support the IHM could not be done because of the restrictions on inspecting a vessel during the Covid-19 pandemic. In all such cases where a certificate is based on an IHM without the on-board sampling element, the IHM should in principle not be acceptable as it is not complete.

However, considering that since March 2020 there has been little or no opportunity for surveyors to go on-board ships and undertake these surveys, such a remote survey/sampling could be exceptionally accepted, if there is evidence that the flag State has agreed to this. Furthermore, in this case, there would also have to be documented plans and arrangements kept on-board the ship indicating when it will be feasible for qualified samplers to complete the IHM with respect to limitations caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. It is then for the inspector to decide whether this evidence is acceptable on a case-by-case basis depending on the specific circumstances of the vessel in question and using his professional judgement.

If the inspector does accept the evidence provided by the owner/master, then for the Inventory Certificate or Statement of Compliance the inspector should specify that the IHM should be completed and approved within 4 months after the inspection. In addition, a warning should be given to the vessel and the inspection result and warning should registered in the ship recycling module of THETIS – EU.

If these plans have to be amended further after the inspection, due to continuing travel or access restrictions, then the owner/master needs to provide sufficient written evidence from the IHM inspectors that it has not been feasible to meet the initial plans. Again, it is then for the inspector undertaking the next inspection to decide whether this evidence is acceptable on a case-by-case basis depending on the specific circumstances of the vessel in question and using his professional judgement.

For the Ready for Recycling Certificate, if the inspector does accept this evidence after evaluation on a case-by-case basis, the owner/master of the vessel should be warned that it is required to complete the IHM and obtain an updated Ready for Recycling Certificate before entering the ship recycling facility. The inspection result and warning should be registered in the ship recycling module of THETIS – EU.

UNQUOTE

Refer the following link for details.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:JOC_2020_349_R_0001

Leave a comment